« More On Both/And | Main | Either It's "Design" Or It's "Innovation" »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c8a3353ef00d83558172d69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Still More On Both/And:
The comments to this entry are closed.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 |
Hugh writes about his idea here, and references it again, here. I love the cartoon he uses to illustrate his point.
I think Hugh is correct. Today, most creative people live in the sex/cash either/or.
My thinking (hope?) is that as organizations and cultures evolve, a more holistic approach to creativity within a business context will also evolve. Listen to Richard Rogers, architect of the Center Pompidou (pictured above):
Rogers' recognition of the contextual nature of creativity (on an architectural scale) is an example of both/and: the architect must "absorb" the legal, technical, political and economic constraints for a building to truly be a "success." I think the same is true for any product developed within a commercial context.As organizations become more comfortable with both/and approaches to problem solving, perhaps, as Michael put it, it will become possible to "transcend Hugh's 'tense duality.'"
Update: Read Dave Weinberger's dream about the development of both/and thinking.
Tags: Either/Or Thinking Design